Thanks, will dig deeper. Curious.
While I make sure we check things on our end, here is the direct link for the greenhouse application page
Reasonable answers:
;; ANSWER SECTION:
okra.ng. 60 IN A 13.225.63.61
okra.ng. 60 IN A 13.225.63.113
okra.ng. 60 IN A 13.225.63.21
okra.ng. 60 IN A 13.225.63.37
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
okra.ng. 211 IN NS ns-1302.awsdns-34.org.
okra.ng. 211 IN NS ns-1628.awsdns-11.co.uk.
okra.ng. 211 IN NS ns-644.awsdns-16.net.
okra.ng. 211 IN NS ns67.domaincontrol.com.
Answers via 1.1.1.1: ;; ANSWER SECTION:
okra.ng. 60 IN A 52.85.247.56
okra.ng. 60 IN A 52.85.247.35
okra.ng. 60 IN A 52.85.247.69
okra.ng. 60 IN A 52.85.247.124
Not sure what to make of the lack of an authority section.`dig @1.1.1.1 okra.ng` should allow you to reproduce (or perhaps my computer is simply hallucinating).
Do a Whois on the IP address (ex. https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-99-86-0-0-1/pft?s=99.86....) and you will find who it's registered to. All of the different IPs belong to AMAZO-CF. This is almost certainly Amazon CloudFront, providing different endpoints (with different IPs) around the world depending on where the resolver is.
You're getting different IPs depending on whether you use one network or another, or one DNS resolver or another, because that's how CloudFront works (in this configuration).
WRT the certificate errors: It's of course possible that one endpoint out of many could have had a problem serving a certificate, but CloudFront is a pretty reliable service; it's likely if there was a problem with one endpoint it would have been happening with all of them. The most likely reason for certificate errors for one person in this case is the problem was on the user's end.