zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. Doreen+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-09-26 23:54:07
You are missing the part where I harmed his health to comply with their expectations. He was fine and does better on a high quality diet than on a junk food diet.

Weight isn't the only metric that matters.

replies(2): >>hezral+J2 >>whidde+vj1
2. hezral+J2[view] [source] 2023-09-27 00:08:07
>>Doreen+(OP)
What do you consider a high quality diet? What would meals for a day look like to you?
replies(1): >>lcnPyl+P9
◧◩
3. lcnPyl+P9[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-27 00:51:41
>>hezral+J2
If you haven’t already: find the accusation in your comment.
replies(2): >>LastTr+fc >>rendal+cO
◧◩◪
4. LastTr+fc[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-27 01:06:43
>>lcnPyl+P9
It’s a very simple question - one that my kid’s pediatrician asks during almost every visit. Weird that you take it as an accusation.
replies(1): >>clipsy+Fd
◧◩◪◨
5. clipsy+Fd[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-27 01:16:25
>>LastTr+fc
What's weird is that you apparently don't understand the difference between being asked that question by your child's pediatrician vs a random stranger on the internet.
replies(1): >>Dylan1+NK
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. Dylan1+NK[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-27 05:17:43
>>clipsy+Fd
The question is not weird in the context of telling the story on a messageboard.

If we were applying the default "random stranger" rules, the story never would have been shared in the first place.

replies(1): >>ahoka+hX1
◧◩◪
7. rendal+cO[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-27 05:53:33
>>lcnPyl+P9
I think there is a class of internet bully that clusters around stories like this, not unlike the "think of the children crowd" mentioned in the article.
8. whidde+vj1[view] [source] 2023-09-27 10:15:08
>>Doreen+(OP)
Harmed his health by what metric?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
9. ahoka+hX1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-27 14:24:30
>>Dylan1+NK
The answer can make the story wildly different.
[go to top]