zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. pauldd+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-09-24 23:43:12
"Toy/low throughput" = "Toy or low throughout"
replies(1): >>djur+Cs
2. djur+Cs[view] [source] 2023-09-25 05:42:31
>>pauldd+(OP)
Can you define "low throughput"? I think people have significantly different ideas of what that means.
replies(2): >>klysm+oN2 >>pauldd+RU2
◧◩
3. klysm+oN2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-25 19:07:12
>>djur+Cs
Yeah I think people generally reach for “big” tools when this “toy” would work fine for the vast majority of projects.
◧◩
4. pauldd+RU2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-25 19:39:37
>>djur+Cs
> Can you define "low throughput"?

IDK maybe <1000 messages per minute

Not saying SKIP LOCKED can't work with that many. But you'll probably want to do something with lower overhead.

FWIW, Que uses advisory locks [1]

[1] https://github.com/que-rb/que

[go to top]