zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. klysm+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-09-24 23:30:29
Not all use cases are high throughput. That’s not what makes it a toy
replies(1): >>pauldd+81
2. pauldd+81[view] [source] 2023-09-24 23:43:12
>>klysm+(OP)
"Toy/low throughput" = "Toy or low throughout"
replies(1): >>djur+Kt
◧◩
3. djur+Kt[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-25 05:42:31
>>pauldd+81
Can you define "low throughput"? I think people have significantly different ideas of what that means.
replies(2): >>klysm+wO2 >>pauldd+ZV2
◧◩◪
4. klysm+wO2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-25 19:07:12
>>djur+Kt
Yeah I think people generally reach for “big” tools when this “toy” would work fine for the vast majority of projects.
◧◩◪
5. pauldd+ZV2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-25 19:39:37
>>djur+Kt
> Can you define "low throughput"?

IDK maybe <1000 messages per minute

Not saying SKIP LOCKED can't work with that many. But you'll probably want to do something with lower overhead.

FWIW, Que uses advisory locks [1]

[1] https://github.com/que-rb/que

[go to top]