* Had severe undiagnosed pneumonia.
* Was prescribed an opioid medication that is no longer deemed safe for children.
* Had diarrhea and a fever of 104F for 5 days prior to her death.
How can you not entertain the possibility that her death had absolutely nothing to do with the fact that someone claims a dude shook a child one time?
In any case the conviction doesn't remotely approach the bar of "beyond a reasonable doubt"