zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. jncfhn+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-09-07 16:37:01
Guess you don’t like Hamlet either then, which is a reinvented Amleth.

I struggle to see how the gp here can still be so bothered by the “feminist” film that did just a couple hundred thousand in the box office five years ago personally. That is a tiny drop in the bucket.

replies(1): >>peyton+2U
2. peyton+2U[view] [source] 2023-09-07 20:27:08
>>jncfhn+(OP)
I’m not bothered. I don’t think the FCC will prioritize it.
replies(1): >>jncfhn+uH1
◧◩
3. jncfhn+uH1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-08 01:28:28
>>peyton+2U
Because it was a tiny film from five years ago that was neither critically nor financially successful despite 8 reviewers being offered $50.

I just can’t fathom why you felt compelled to reference it and the fact that it was “feminist”

replies(1): >>peyton+WH7
◧◩◪
4. peyton+WH7[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-09 23:13:42
>>jncfhn+uH1
I think it’s fine to describe a film on a discussion forum. I just Googled what it is and copied the first thing I saw. I referenced it so others have that information too.
[go to top]