zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
1 comments
1. jncfhn+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2023-09-08 01:28:28
Because it was a tiny film from five years ago that was neither critically nor financially successful despite 8 reviewers being offered $50.
I just can’t fathom why you felt compelled to reference it and the fact that it was “feminist”
replies(1):
>>peyton+s06
◧
2. peyton+s06
[view]
[source]
2023-09-09 23:13:42
>>jncfhn+(OP)
I think it’s fine to describe a film on a discussion forum. I just Googled what it is and copied the first thing I saw. I referenced it so others have that information too.
[go to top]