zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. jncfhn+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-09-08 01:28:28
Because it was a tiny film from five years ago that was neither critically nor financially successful despite 8 reviewers being offered $50.

I just can’t fathom why you felt compelled to reference it and the fact that it was “feminist”

replies(1): >>peyton+s06
2. peyton+s06[view] [source] 2023-09-09 23:13:42
>>jncfhn+(OP)
I think it’s fine to describe a film on a discussion forum. I just Googled what it is and copied the first thing I saw. I referenced it so others have that information too.
[go to top]