zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. osigur+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-08-24 19:41:49
A lot of stuff also gets posted which is behind a paywall. I've learned to tune these out for the most part just from the domain name but I still don't see the point.
replies(1): >>tptace+fg
2. tptace+fg[view] [source] 2023-08-24 21:15:01
>>osigur+(OP)
Paywalled stories are OK if there are straightforward workarounds, which are almost always surfaced on the thread. Stories that people simply can't read without subscribing are off-topic here.

>>10178989

replies(2): >>osigur+Wf1 >>dredmo+Rh1
◧◩
3. osigur+Wf1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-25 05:36:13
>>tptace+fg
Interesting, I'd always thought the paywall workarounds were a terms of use violation.
◧◩
4. dredmo+Rh1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-25 05:58:56
>>tptace+fg
This has been somewhat increasingly problematic over the past month or so as well-known existing workarounds seem to be increasingly problematic or failing.

Around 15% or more of HN front-page submissions are to paywalled and/or general news sites.

(I've classified the latter in my analysis of historic HN front-page activity, I haven't gone through to specifically note paywalled sites.)

And tightening paywalls can have a large impact on submissions. After the New York Times strengthened its paywall in 2019, HN front-page submissions fell to about 25% of their previous level.

<>>36918251 >

[go to top]