zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. yjftsj+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-08-24 17:19:25
I probably agree that if downvotes were only for off-topic/trolling/unhelpful comments the situation would be better, but I don't think we're there; I am fairly confident that downvoting for disagreement is common and officially okay.
replies(2): >>almost+97 >>kccqzy+la
2. almost+97[view] [source] 2023-08-24 17:46:04
>>yjftsj+(OP)
Similarly, are up-votes expressing agreement or do they indicate something worth reading (opposite of thd topic/trolling/unhelpful)?

Some comments can go yo-yo, but I don't think it is possible to see the two counts separately.

replies(1): >>em-bee+qc
3. kccqzy+la[view] [source] 2023-08-24 17:59:51
>>yjftsj+(OP)
I asked this exact same thing a while ago: >>36673613

So yes downvotes for mere disagreements are okay here.

replies(1): >>sander+Ge
◧◩
4. em-bee+qc[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-24 18:10:58
>>almost+97
on a technical level, being able to see downvotes and upvotes separately would actually be interesting, as it does carry a signal, but it probably doesn't happen often enough to be worth the effort to implement.
replies(1): >>epanch+ucr
◧◩
5. sander+Ge[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-24 18:21:42
>>kccqzy+la
Yep, there is no doubting what the policy is. But it is reasonable to question whether it is the right policy.
◧◩◪
6. epanch+ucr[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-01 21:21:41
>>em-bee+qc
Reddit does this as “controversial” and it is a good feature.
[go to top]