zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. epanch+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-08-24 17:15:32
I do not downvote for comments I disagree with.

I downvote for off topic, or for comments which detract from the conversation. I believe most others with the ability to downvote do the same.

Replying to off topic posts would be counter to the purpose of downvoting.

replies(1): >>yjftsj+T
2. yjftsj+T[view] [source] 2023-08-24 17:19:25
>>epanch+(OP)
I probably agree that if downvotes were only for off-topic/trolling/unhelpful comments the situation would be better, but I don't think we're there; I am fairly confident that downvoting for disagreement is common and officially okay.
replies(2): >>almost+28 >>kccqzy+eb
◧◩
3. almost+28[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-24 17:46:04
>>yjftsj+T
Similarly, are up-votes expressing agreement or do they indicate something worth reading (opposite of thd topic/trolling/unhelpful)?

Some comments can go yo-yo, but I don't think it is possible to see the two counts separately.

replies(1): >>em-bee+jd
◧◩
4. kccqzy+eb[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-24 17:59:51
>>yjftsj+T
I asked this exact same thing a while ago: >>36673613

So yes downvotes for mere disagreements are okay here.

replies(1): >>sander+zf
◧◩◪
5. em-bee+jd[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-24 18:10:58
>>almost+28
on a technical level, being able to see downvotes and upvotes separately would actually be interesting, as it does carry a signal, but it probably doesn't happen often enough to be worth the effort to implement.
replies(1): >>epanch+ndr
◧◩◪
6. sander+zf[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-24 18:21:42
>>kccqzy+eb
Yep, there is no doubting what the policy is. But it is reasonable to question whether it is the right policy.
◧◩◪◨
7. epanch+ndr[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-09-01 21:21:41
>>em-bee+jd
Reddit does this as “controversial” and it is a good feature.
[go to top]