zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. vasco+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-08-15 05:43:47
> Suggestions welcome

"This domain is not allowed on HN" as an error message upon submission.

replies(2): >>altair+u >>djur+u1
2. altair+u[view] [source] 2023-08-15 05:48:16
>>vasco+(OP)
That’s not going to work, because now that’s an API for spammers to bulk process against a domain list. The only available API must be human communication to the mod team, or the spammers will overcome it with automation.
replies(2): >>vasco+T1 >>dontup+jI3
3. djur+u1[view] [source] 2023-08-15 05:58:35
>>vasco+(OP)
That encourages switching to another domain for spammy submissions.
◧◩
4. vasco+T1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-15 06:02:18
>>altair+u
Spammers can already do that API call and see if the domain shows up. This only puts human users at the same level of consideration as spammer automation.
replies(1): >>altair+z2
◧◩◪
5. altair+z2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-15 06:12:44
>>vasco+T1
Seriously dedicated spammers can, yes! But antispam is about reducing the noise threshold, and eliminating low-effort spam opportunities that can be done to a single HTTP endpoint with a bash script is a big win. Simply having to access two pages is already too much to bother with for the vast majority.
◧◩
6. dontup+jI3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-16 10:04:00
>>altair+u
That's trivial to figure out.

It's quite possible the reason the list isn't public is because it would give away information about what thought is allowed and what thought isn't.

replies(1): >>altair+KU4
◧◩◪
7. altair+KU4[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-16 16:28:07
>>dontup+jI3
> That’s trivial to figure out.

Elaborate.

[go to top]