zlacker

[parent] [thread] 15 comments
1. reject+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-08-05 10:51:32
He is a king amongst men.

Incredible service to humanity.

replies(1): >>defros+B
2. defros+B[view] [source] 2023-08-05 10:58:01
>>reject+(OP)
Sure, ... unless the person behind the “Denis Petrov” nom de guerre is another Alexandra Elbakyan.
replies(2): >>reject+a5 >>pests+iq4
◧◩
3. reject+a5[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-05 11:53:22
>>defros+B
Why is that bad? From searching, she is behind sci-hub?
replies(1): >>defros+K5
◧◩◪
4. defros+K5[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-05 11:58:46
>>reject+a5
There's no suggestion that would be a bad thing.

Just highlighting the flaw in your assumption that the anonymous person behind this is male.

replies(2): >>xereet+c6 >>nora-p+3a
◧◩◪◨
5. xereet+c6[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-05 12:03:10
>>defros+K5
The way you phrased it definitely made it sound like you were implying it was a bad thing lol
replies(1): >>defros+g8
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. defros+g8[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-05 12:22:16
>>xereet+c6
That'd be the way that you read it, if they were another Alexandra Elbakyan (or Joanna Rutkowska, or Stephanie Wehner, or ... ) then they clearly wouldn't be a King among Men.

Just as I wrote.

replies(3): >>pimlot+hb >>reject+Wd >>vrong+hm
◧◩◪◨
7. nora-p+3a[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-05 12:38:59
>>defros+K5
Both names are unisex
replies(1): >>jimbob+Hj
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
8. pimlot+hb[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-05 12:47:49
>>defros+g8
The issue is more that your comment can be seen as a respond to the /last/ sentence of the original post.
replies(1): >>defros+El
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
9. reject+Wd[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-05 13:09:21
>>defros+g8
It reads to me same as xereeto said. That's why I asked. Maybe think about that? Do you have some difficulty in interactions?
replies(1): >>defros+Mk
◧◩◪◨⬒
10. jimbob+Hj[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-05 13:52:50
>>nora-p+3a
Assuming Russian looking spelling, Alexandra is a female name and Denis is a male name.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
11. defros+Mk[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-05 14:01:21
>>reject+Wd
> Do you have some difficulty in interactions?

No.

I do have 40+ years of observing commenters on internet forums assuming unknowns are male by default.

Maybe think about that?

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
12. defros+El[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-05 14:07:07
>>pimlot+hb
Only to those unaware of who Alexandra Elbakyan is or to those that chose not to investigate.

For those aware the juxtaposition twixt { King of Men } | { Woman who created massive scientific paper archive } tends to dominate.

But sure, not everybody reads things the same way.

replies(1): >>reject+hp
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
13. vrong+hm[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-05 14:12:14
>>defros+g8
Well, one of those you mentioned would.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
14. reject+hp[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-05 14:31:18
>>defros+El
No, it is due to the way you phrased the question.
replies(1): >>defros+C32
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
15. defros+C32[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-06 03:25:37
>>reject+hp
It was a statement, not a question.

That suggests the deeper issue might be language fluency, English can be difficult to parse.

◧◩
16. pests+iq4[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-08-06 22:56:20
>>defros+B
Did Alexandra Elbayan do something wrong ? Why wouldn't you wouldn't to be compared to them?
[go to top]