zlacker

4% of global browser usage can be described in many ways (defeated, miserable, collapse compared to the past etc) but it definitely is not dead and is one of few developed browsers.

>>matkon+(OP)
If we're arguing about whether 4% global usage constitutes dead, then yes, it's truly dead and Mozilla is completely irrelevant. Even Microsoft is more important these days (again).

>>matkon+(OP)
For many years what is now macOS hovered around 3% usage.

The phoenix can rise.

The frozen chicken can not.

Still breathing makes a huge difference.

>>solard+Z1
The difference between 0% and 5% is that at 0%, if you want an alternative, you have to write it yourself, but at 5%, the alternative exists. Mozilla is not dead.

If you don’t like what Google is doing, don’t pretend that Firefox does not exist. Do something instead. File bug reports, send patches, donate to those who are working on Firefox and countering Google.

>>jamiek+U4
Maybe if they replaced top Mozilla leadership. Apple had to reinvent itself back into relevance. Mozilla refuses to, and just keeps stagnating in a cesspool of rot and nostalgia. They're less a browser maker these days and more an ineffective think tank. I think Google keeps them around just as a "useful fool" so they can look less like a monopoly...

Probably better for a different org with different leadership to start over. I wouldn't count on Mozilla to miraculously reinvent itself.

>>nequo+q5
Frankly I trust Mozilla's governance even less than Google's. They took an amazing product (Phoenix) and mismanaged it into irrelevance.

If there were a good browser run by a different nonprofit org, I would support that.

>>solard+D7
Even if you don't trust Mozilla, they cannot do what Google is already doing. Mozilla doesn't have nearly enough market power to force something like WEI down our throats.

>>solard+Z1
> If we're arguing about whether 4% global usage constitutes dead, then yes, it's truly dead

I am posting from maintained Mozilla Firefox.

That would be impossible if FF would be dead.

>>matkon+(OP)
There's no plan, no growth, they don't have a mobile OS, and users will use whatever browser (aka, "the internet") comes with their device. On Windows, Edge is being heavily "promoted". Most of the technical people I know gave up, unfortunately.

>>solard+Z1
>If we're arguing about whether 4% global usage constitutes dead, then yes, it's truly dead and Mozilla is completely irrelevant. Even Microsoft is more important these days (again).

According to these folks[0], Firefox has a 3.29% market share globally. They also claim there are 4.66 billion browser users globally.

If those numbers are correct, Firefox has a bit more than 150,000,000 users worldwide.

If my software had 150,000,000 users, I'd consider that wildly successful.

Other folks have different ideas/takes on that, I suppose. But it's food for thought nonetheless.

[0] https://backlinko.com/browser-market-share#worldwide-browser...

Edit: Fixed prose.

>>slig+Fl
Corporate + institutional mass installs on Windows and Linux — e.g. university computer labs — are still mostly Firefox. It's easier to lock down something that's not part of the OS; and it's easier to create a local-network roaming-user-profile experience that's seamless between the machines that must run Windows (regular labs) and the machines that must run Linux (CompSci labs.)