zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. comfyp+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-06-25 21:25:15
You could easily reword your comment as wishing there were convenience stores without the magazines.

I agree with the other person here. It’s just the context of YouTube. Take HN for example: there’s little to no adult content on this site.

I’m in a similar camp in that I’m frustrated daily that Facebook can’t figure out that I (admittedly a single 30 male) don’t want the lewd content. I say “show less of this” on every lewd post, but it can’t figure it out.

That being said, I think the answer is fostering/finding other communities with different natures rather than changing Facebook or YouTube to be something they aren’t.

replies(2): >>throwa+U6 >>youain+yd
2. throwa+U6[view] [source] 2023-06-25 22:14:02
>>comfyp+(OP)
How many content discovery systems can you point to that have the breadth and depth of video content that Youtube does?

I don't think it's too much to just give feedback into the void with the hope that if enough people chime in with the same thoughts, that some day some Google PM might actually do something about it.

That being said, I'm sure its a question of $ budget for ML recommender processing and/or the cost of labeling videos. But the labeling could be done by users.

3. youain+yd[view] [source] 2023-06-25 23:05:06
>>comfyp+(OP)
Something I discovered accidentally was that searching for maternity bras got rid of most of the lewd content for a few weeks.
[go to top]