zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. phendr+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-05-31 20:12:39
Seems to me like they priced the API to cash in on the LLM training data gold rush, and as a side-effect it makes third-party user apps infeasible. Oops.
replies(1): >>hender+Z2
2. hender+Z2[view] [source] 2023-05-31 20:24:57
>>phendr+(OP)
They priced the API for LLM training and killing third-party apps is just a great bonus. If they wanted to retain third-party apps while protecting their revenue stream they could have simply created a new free API including all the ads. They deliberately chose to kill these apps.
replies(2): >>dontre+E3 >>phendr+5Q
◧◩
3. dontre+E3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 20:27:23
>>hender+Z2
Why wouldn’t people then just scrape using the free API?
replies(2): >>nawgz+7b >>bluefi+he
◧◩◪
4. nawgz+7b[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 21:05:45
>>dontre+E3
Most users are not technical

Most technical users are still happy to use a GUI over writing their own scraper / visualizer

◧◩◪
5. bluefi+he[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 21:23:35
>>dontre+E3
You can throttle APIs so they are still useful for a human browsing content, but essentially worthless for scraping meaningful amounts of data.

You can also detect accounts that are displaying scraping behavior and block them.

replies(1): >>dontre+Dq
◧◩◪◨
6. dontre+Dq[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-31 22:31:47
>>bluefi+he
An LLM only has to download text once. You could easily coordinate a scrape across various IPs and accounts over the course of a couple of months and it would be really hard to detect. Especially if you target alternate GUI api based versions of the site.
◧◩
7. phendr+5Q[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-06-01 02:11:50
>>hender+Z2
I think Hanlon's Razor applies here.
[go to top]