zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. jojoba+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-05-29 06:14:36
No, but if a library worker decides to put pornographic books on children's shelves you can't force them to remove it.
replies(1): >>aidenn+GO
2. aidenn+GO[view] [source] 2023-05-29 14:29:29
>>jojoba+(OP)
Thanks for engaging my extreme example on its own terms. If that's what this law actually does, I'm kind of okay with that. I trust a random librarian's judgement far more than any law passed by grandstanding politicians in order to stir up anger.
replies(1): >>jojoba+y42
◧◩
3. jojoba+y42[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-29 23:09:20
>>aidenn+GO
Well your trust is misplaced.

https://www.kcrg.com/2023/05/19/this-book-is-gay-iowas-loomi...

replies(1): >>aidenn+yX3
◧◩◪
4. aidenn+yX3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-30 16:01:18
>>jojoba+y42
I'm not sure what your point is (or if you read my comment correctly). I definitely think that letting librarians make the decision is better than a law that bans all books with depictions of sex from all grades. I have read this specific book and I would have been on the side of allowing it in high-schools, but not junior highs. However, I can see how a reasonable person would disagree with me, and the most prurient parts of chapter 9 are no more titillating than my junior high sex-education class, which I recall as being less titillating than looking at pictures of topless women in National Geographic, and that was definitely available in the library.
[go to top]