zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. jojoba+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-05-29 23:09:20
Well your trust is misplaced.

https://www.kcrg.com/2023/05/19/this-book-is-gay-iowas-loomi...

replies(1): >>aidenn+0T1
2. aidenn+0T1[view] [source] 2023-05-30 16:01:18
>>jojoba+(OP)
I'm not sure what your point is (or if you read my comment correctly). I definitely think that letting librarians make the decision is better than a law that bans all books with depictions of sex from all grades. I have read this specific book and I would have been on the side of allowing it in high-schools, but not junior highs. However, I can see how a reasonable person would disagree with me, and the most prurient parts of chapter 9 are no more titillating than my junior high sex-education class, which I recall as being less titillating than looking at pictures of topless women in National Geographic, and that was definitely available in the library.
[go to top]