zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. hot_gr+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-05-18 23:03:14
If you own a house in a suburb, and some random people are sitting on the sidewalk directly in front of your house instead of going to a nearby park or anything else of interest to them, you might wonder what they're up to.
replies(3): >>xboxno+hC >>_v7gu+dq1 >>diggin+S82
2. xboxno+hC[view] [source] 2023-05-19 04:48:55
>>hot_gr+(OP)
Only because we've developed the culture that loitering is crime.
replies(1): >>hot_gr+r42
3. _v7gu+dq1[view] [source] 2023-05-19 12:23:48
>>hot_gr+(OP)
Yeah, they paid all that money to not be living next to poor people. How dare they just waltz in and sit on their sidewalks?
replies(1): >>hot_gr+g52
◧◩
4. hot_gr+r42[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-19 15:58:39
>>xboxno+hC
Loitering in front of a house just looks suspicious, and I don't think there's any law against it. The crime is if you come back to find litter, or they've messed with your house.
◧◩
5. hot_gr+g52[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-19 16:03:18
>>_v7gu+dq1
Doesn't matter if they're poor. Teens who vandalize stuff are probably not poor either.
6. diggin+S82[view] [source] 2023-05-19 16:25:44
>>hot_gr+(OP)
That's because American suburbs are culture and commerce deserts, designed to sell cars (and to promote racism! but that's not the current topic). If you own a house in a livable neighborhood, with stores down the street, it isn't that weird for people to hang out in any particular spot. There are perfectly non-nefarious things/people they could be waiting for.

This is what I meant in the second half of my previous comment.

replies(1): >>hot_gr+9z2
◧◩
7. hot_gr+9z2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-05-19 18:37:32
>>diggin+S82
The part about stores is what I mean too. If the neighborhood were mixed-purpose, there'd be a reason to hang out on the street.
[go to top]