zlacker

There’s a huge middle ground between ChatGPT and an “open source unrestricted model”. OpenAI’s playground lets you specify your own system prompts for GPT4, which allows for a lot more latitude in user prompts and responses.

But if you’re looking to generate truly racist and vile stuff, yes, you probably will need a model with no training or inference filters. I’m not sure anyone’s investing in building that though.

>>brooks+(OP)
>I’m not sure anyone’s investing in building that though.

LLaMA already exists.

>>brooks+(OP)
State actors assuredly are (in addition to e.g. LLaMa); the cost of pysops, especially social engineering, will be reduced to pennies on the dollar.

>>lightb+pd
I don’t those state actors are releasing models as open and free though, as parent was looking for.

>>brooks+(OP)
The number of people that want to create racist content is small, the issue I had is when the API is itself racist, as I mentioned in other places, you give it safe prompt and the API generates unsafe stuff. There is already unsafe stuff in ChatGPT they only added a pathetic filter on top and made us p[ay for it\s failures.

>>simion+5l1
>The number of people that want to create racist content is small...

No it's not. Elon Musk thinks there's a huge demand for racist AI, and he's probably right, or at least alt-right.

Elon Musk yearns for AI devs to build 'anti-woke' rival ChatGPT bot:

https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/06/ai_roundup/

>>sebzim+c6
That has filters in its weights