zlacker

>>exar08+(OP)
For true Sims and LLM you would need an open source unrestricted model, Sims games simulate life so you have mean,evil,criminals sims and you also have adult stuff. ChatGPT is defective since I can give it same prompt 10 times and 2 of 10 will refuse to show it's output because it thinks it is too racist and created bad content while 8 of 10 times he did it.

So with a safe prompt there is always a chance the AI will go on a bad direction and then refuse to work, and make you pay for the tokens of his "I am sorry ....long speech"

>>simion+Qt
There’s a huge middle ground between ChatGPT and an “open source unrestricted model”. OpenAI’s playground lets you specify your own system prompts for GPT4, which allows for a lot more latitude in user prompts and responses.

But if you’re looking to generate truly racist and vile stuff, yes, you probably will need a model with no training or inference filters. I’m not sure anyone’s investing in building that though.

>>brooks+1w
The number of people that want to create racist content is small, the issue I had is when the API is itself racist, as I mentioned in other places, you give it safe prompt and the API generates unsafe stuff. There is already unsafe stuff in ChatGPT they only added a pathetic filter on top and made us p[ay for it\s failures.

>>simion+6R1
>The number of people that want to create racist content is small...

No it's not. Elon Musk thinks there's a huge demand for racist AI, and he's probably right, or at least alt-right.

Elon Musk yearns for AI devs to build 'anti-woke' rival ChatGPT bot:

https://www.theregister.com/2023/03/06/ai_roundup/