zlacker

[parent] [thread] 0 comments
1. varunj+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-03-18 17:34:20
Metrics based on issues / commit activity are certainly higher fidelity.

As you indicate though, they require more effort to adjudicate. Are issues from core team members? Are commits meaningful? Is community activity meaningful? I wish GitHub would give allow us to parse things like this more easily.

My use of star count is generally a binary indicator. 1k+ is probably a legit project and below is probably still early. Beyond that, it's probably too noisy.

[go to top]