zlacker

youtube competitor. that's just funny to me. kind of even comes across as petty. you took however much time to investigate average viewed time of a competitor and then cried to daddy about the perceived slight in "advantage" instead of taking that time to improve your competing product to make it better.

>>dylan6+(OP)
Umm…

I think you have it backwards, the other video was using fake likes to avoid having to improve their quality to get an equal number of eyeballs.

>>dylan6+(OP)
No, we had someone show up out the blue, with no established presence in the space, with a video with hundreds of thousands of views. Was curious how they were so viral so fast.

Overall, it's bad for everyone if someone can create fraudulent views: us, other companies, and most importantly, consumers.

> taking that time to improve your competing product to make it better.

Took less than 3 minutes to do the math and send the report. I'm a fast developer, but I can't improve our product that fast :-)

>>UncleE+M1
Truth rises to the occasion. All these years later, they're sitting at 2.3 stars on Google, even though they charge less, and we are sitting on 5 :-)