zlacker

>>kaeruc+(OP)
Sounds like they take it more serious than Google does likes on Youtube. A competitor had a video that rapidly had over 100k likes - but if you looked at the total time played, each view averaged to just a couple of seconds on a video over 10 minutes. Reported it, but nothing came of it. (No, not something we regularly do. I think it may be the only video I've ever reported; just want a fair playing field)

>>bdcrav+vR
youtube competitor. that's just funny to me. kind of even comes across as petty. you took however much time to investigate average viewed time of a competitor and then cried to daddy about the perceived slight in "advantage" instead of taking that time to improve your competing product to make it better.

>>dylan6+zS
Umm…

I think you have it backwards, the other video was using fake likes to avoid having to improve their quality to get an equal number of eyeballs.

>>UncleE+lU
Truth rises to the occasion. All these years later, they're sitting at 2.3 stars on Google, even though they charge less, and we are sitting on 5 :-)