zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. 112358+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-02-19 02:45:16
It read to me as if you think there isn’t sufficient standing to criticize these edits as long as another problem exists. The “I would also like to bring to your attention…” makes the denouncement in the previous sentence seem sarcastic. Replied in good faith to what I hope was an earnest question.
replies(1): >>consum+Mg
2. consum+Mg[view] [source] 2023-02-19 05:25:16
>>112358+(OP)
That was not my intention at all.

I thought clearly stating that I thought TFA was a messed up situation made that clear.

I think both things are not good.

replies(1): >>112358+J31
◧◩
3. 112358+J31[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-02-19 14:26:10
>>consum+Mg
I get it. I understand your meaning.
[go to top]