zlacker

[return to "Hundreds of changes made to latest editions of Roald Dahl's books"]
1. krona+AU[view] [source] 2023-02-19 00:53:21
>>GavCo+(OP)
Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered... Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right. - George Orwell
◧◩
2. consum+hZ[view] [source] 2023-02-19 01:38:35
>>krona+AU
This Dahl situation seems ridiculous and deserving of derision.

I would also like to bring your attention to the Florida school book ban which applies not just to new editions of one author, but to an entire state's education system.

> Among the titles that have been removed and banned in the course of the vetting in her school district are Toni Morrison’s ‘The Bluest Eye,’ ‘The Kite Runner’ by Khaled Hosseini, ‘The Stranger’ by Albert Camus, ‘Revolting Rhymes’ by Roald Dahl, and a skateboarding magazine called ‘Thrasher’.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/florida-bo...

◧◩◪
3. pessim+N21[view] [source] 2023-02-19 02:04:58
>>consum+hZ
Justifying censorship with other censorship is a spiral of doom.
◧◩◪◨
4. consum+m31[view] [source] 2023-02-19 02:09:24
>>pessim+N21
I'm sorry, maybe I don't understand your reply. Did you read my comment as some sort of justification of either the Dahl estate's rewriting of Dahl's work or the state sponsored censorship in happening in Florida?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. 112358+281[view] [source] 2023-02-19 02:45:16
>>consum+m31
It read to me as if you think there isn’t sufficient standing to criticize these edits as long as another problem exists. The “I would also like to bring to your attention…” makes the denouncement in the previous sentence seem sarcastic. Replied in good faith to what I hope was an earnest question.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. consum+Oo1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 05:25:16
>>112358+281
That was not my intention at all.

I thought clearly stating that I thought TFA was a messed up situation made that clear.

I think both things are not good.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. 112358+Lb2[view] [source] 2023-02-19 14:26:10
>>consum+Oo1
I get it. I understand your meaning.
[go to top]