zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. tptace+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-02-19 00:09:02
I agree; the issue here is more than there's a Monkey Christ level of literary competence that went into these changes (and also what seems like much, much too much ambition about what to change).
replies(1): >>agentw+k1
2. agentw+k1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 00:20:03
>>tptace+(OP)
I agree to a certain degree, the scope and fairly transparent agenda of the changes definitely make it more of a problem. I'm still put off by the project. I guess there's probably a small set of edits you could make that would be beneficial and not lose the original tone. I'm not convinced of the value of that project but maybe I could get behind it.
replies(1): >>tptace+S3
◧◩
3. tptace+S3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-02-19 00:41:03
>>agentw+k1
I think a more gifted set of writers could have made the same changes less dunkably, is I guess most of what I have to say here. I sort of do get the idea of excising the fat references, for instance --- I wouldn't, but I get it: these are books for kids, and that's a thing kids absolutely do get victimized over. But if you're going to do it, don't fuck up the music of the prose, or relocate the inflections to Oberlin, Ohio.
[go to top]