zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. dymk+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-01-14 08:18:55
“Did they have a right to use publicly posted images” is up for the courts to decide
replies(1): >>cudgy+qc
2. cudgy+qc[view] [source] 2023-01-14 10:36:12
>>dymk+(OP)
Pretty sure that’s already decided. Publicly played movies and music are not available to be used. Why would the same not apply to posted images?
replies(2): >>dymk+NC >>UncleE+SJ
◧◩
3. dymk+NC[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-01-14 14:58:21
>>cudgy+qc
What court case set the president that you can’t train a neural network on publicly posted movies and audio?
replies(1): >>Xelyne+BO
◧◩
4. UncleE+SJ[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-01-14 15:51:34
>>cudgy+qc
If you post a song on your website and I listen to it am I violating your copyright?

If my parrot recites your song after hearing my alleged infringement, I record its performance and post it on YouTube is that infringement?

Last one, if I use the song from your website to train an song recognition AI is that infringement?

replies(1): >>Xelyne+UO
◧◩◪
5. Xelyne+BO[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-01-14 16:28:52
>>dymk+NC
I'd assume the precedent would be about sharing encoder data, which would be covered in bittorrent cases.

"Training a neural network" is an implementation detail. These companies accessed millions of copyrighted works, encoded them such that the copyright was unenforcable, then sell the output of that transformation.

replies(1): >>dymk+GP
◧◩◪
6. Xelyne+UO[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-01-14 16:31:55
>>UncleE+SJ
If I host a song I don't have license to on my website I'm violating copyright by distributing it to you when you listen on my site.

If my parrot recites your song after hearing it and I record that and upload to YouTube. I've violated your copyright.

If a big company does the same(runs the song through a non-human process, then sells the output) I believe they're blatantly infringing copyright.

replies(2): >>dymk+0Q >>UncleE+YZ1
◧◩◪◨
7. dymk+GP[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-01-14 16:37:28
>>Xelyne+BO
Not being able to reproduce the inputs (each image is contributing single bytes to the neural network) is relevant. Torrent files are a means to exactly reproduce their inputs. Diffusion models are trained to not reproduce their inputs, nor do they have the means to.
◧◩◪◨
8. dymk+0Q[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-01-14 16:40:00
>>Xelyne+UO
Big Company is not distributing the input images by distributing the neural network. There is no way to extract even a single input image out of a diffusion model.
◧◩◪◨
9. UncleE+YZ1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-01-15 02:00:38
>>Xelyne+UO
I should have specified the OP has legal rights to the song and the end user listening was under the same granted/implied license as a program doing the web harvesting, my bad.
[go to top]