zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. astran+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:46:03
That's very low for how often law enforcement might contact a social media service. Sometimes it's because people report "illegal" posts to them instead of you. Sometimes it's just because they're old people and aren't going to go through your report form when they could email you.

What controls when you have to respond to them is the law, not them. You'll know when that is, because it'll come with legal process.

replies(2): >>jacque+D >>Khaine+Yw
2. jacque+D[view] [source] 2022-12-17 02:50:45
>>astran+(OP)
It's so low that I'm pretty sure they missed the bulk of the communications between LE and Twitter. But hey, more installments, more eyeballs, more outrage and so more money for Musk.
replies(1): >>mc32+Rd
◧◩
3. mc32+Rd[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-17 04:33:15
>>jacque+D
Are local LE contacting Twitter about possible ToS violations or rather reaching out for cooperation on suspected crimes?

One is none of their business the other is expected.

replies(2): >>jacque+we >>devind+0i
◧◩◪
4. jacque+we[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-17 04:39:02
>>mc32+Rd
Yes and yes. As well as things such as suicide attempts, missing kids and so on.

To give you some numbers: I operated an international community with about 1 million members over the course of 20 years. During that time the number of requests were larger than the number of requests that have been detailed here regarding Twitter, which is one of the reasons why I believe that we are seeing a highly colored picture.

◧◩◪
5. devind+0i[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-17 05:11:22
>>mc32+Rd
Extremely common
6. Khaine+Yw[view] [source] 2022-12-17 08:14:38
>>astran+(OP)
But this wasn’t the total amount of FBI contact. That was just the contact with the head of trust and safety.
[go to top]