zlacker

I do, because I don't see why it wouldn't be. If it's revolutionary and a lot of people need it, or if it change completely the way people work/live/are entertained, it will certainly evolve to be as much accessible as possible. A succesful product is a product used by many.

If it's not, why worry about it ?

>>Famoso+(OP)
> I do, because I don't see why it wouldn't be.

Because of how capitalism works and people always try to corner markets, extract value from other people, etc. etc.?

> If it's not, why worry about it ?

Because we can choose different professions that are less susceptible to automation? Or we can study DL to implement our own AI.

>>ameliu+92
> we can choose different professions that are less susceptible to automation

What are those? It seems it's low-margin, physical work that's seeing the least AI progress. Like berry picking. Maybe also work that will be kept AI-free longer by regulators like being a judge?

>>ajmurm+A8
Perhaps surgery. Or cooking.

>>Famoso+(OP)
I mean, nuclear bombs are not free and available to anyone, yet quite a few people on this planet are involved in worrying about them.

>>ameliu+wG
idk about cooking, but surgery is already seeing AI-aid.

>>Famoso+(OP)
If the demand is high, so will the price. And for AI, data is everything. And data is the domain of the biggest companies.

>>ameliu+wG
I was gonna link to this robot (https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/worlds-first-roboti...) as a reason cooking is "in danger". Seems like it cannot do the harder motor skills like chopping ingredients. In another video it makes a steak and the cooking time seems to be determined by how incredibly slow the robot is. It also makes a huge mess because it has worse motor skills than a toddler. Cooks seem safe for now. Too bad it's already a terrible area to work in because too many people love it.