zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. dotanc+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-12-12 13:49:05
You bolster my point.
replies(1): >>krageo+q4
2. krageo+q4[view] [source] 2022-12-12 14:19:53
>>dotanc+(OP)
Your post read as a propaganda piece for Israel by way of preemptively discrediting everyone that might have anything negative to say about it. If the problem is low-quality content (by way of bots, or I guess special interest groups) then you have contributed far less than the response, which at least had the decency to support it's point with actual facts.
replies(1): >>dotanc+uf1
◧◩
3. dotanc+uf1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-12-12 19:57:57
>>krageo+q4
Rereading my comment, yes, I agree that you are right about that.
[go to top]