zlacker

[return to "Ask HN: Should HN ban ChatGPT/generated responses?"]
1. kossTK+H6[view] [source] 2022-12-11 18:44:32
>>djtrip+(OP)
The fact that soon the internet will be so flooded with bots that you'll be floating eternally alone in a sea of imposters unless we create some draconian real person ID system is a tragedy so great it's crazy it has not dawned on people yet.

I started out loving the net because of the feelings of connection and partly because of the honesty and discussions stemming from at least pseudo anonymity, both silly stuff and egghead discussions on history and tech - but i always felt a "human presence" and community out there behind the screens.

Now anonymity is dying and the value of discussions will plummet because you'll be just be arguing, learning or getting inspired from a selection of corporate PR bots, state sponsored psyopping or "idiot with an assistant" that will try to twist your mind or steal your time 24/7.

Christ this is going to be so incredibly boring, paranoid and lonely for everyone in a few years time!

I'm honestly having an existential crisis, the internets is already filled with too much noise and people are already lonely enough.

Back to local community and family i guess, it was amazing while it lasted..

◧◩
2. seydor+dz1[view] [source] 2022-12-12 06:40:08
>>kossTK+H6
People won't be flooding the net unless there is an incentive. Right now it is google's ads that are driving content generation. If chatbots are used widely instead of google, there will be less incentive to making filler content. And if the web gets flooded with bot content, it will only hasten the demise of google. Either way the thing will balance out
◧◩◪
3. dotanc+hV1[view] [source] 2022-12-12 10:20:12
>>seydor+dz1
You're ignoring political incentive such as the anti-Israel drives. They will certainly flood discussions with by-the-way offhand mentions of "Israeli brutality" in otherwise seemingly innocuous comments on other subjects. There was a spate of this last year, then it subsided, and I would not be surprised to see another wave come, this time automated.
◧◩◪◨
4. t0lo+HZ1[view] [source] 2022-12-12 10:54:03
>>dotanc+hV1
There are many people who have genuine concerns about Israeli issues, such as the election of leaders who prioritise those of one faith over another, the targeted striking of Al Jazeera offices in Palestine, and the eviction of Palestinian citizens from the West Bank https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-63660566. It would be false to assume that brutality of one site absolves the other of criticism for the same actions.

Israel participates in state sponsored propaganda as well. https://www.smh.com.au/technology/israeli-propaganda-war-hit...

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. dotanc+4k2[view] [source] 2022-12-12 13:49:05
>>t0lo+HZ1
You bolster my point.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. krageo+uo2[view] [source] 2022-12-12 14:19:53
>>dotanc+4k2
Your post read as a propaganda piece for Israel by way of preemptively discrediting everyone that might have anything negative to say about it. If the problem is low-quality content (by way of bots, or I guess special interest groups) then you have contributed far less than the response, which at least had the decency to support it's point with actual facts.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. dotanc+yz3[view] [source] 2022-12-12 19:57:57
>>krageo+uo2
Rereading my comment, yes, I agree that you are right about that.
[go to top]