zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. fulafe+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-10-17 05:55:15
Also this depends on jurisdiction.
replies(1): >>zarzav+ky
2. zarzav+ky[view] [source] 2022-10-17 11:50:47
>>fulafe+(OP)
Is there a jurisdiction that allows purely algorithms to be copyrighted? As far as I know, usually algorithms come under the umbrella of patents (in jurisdictions that allow software patents) rather than copyright.

For example, it would interfere with e.g. copyright of scientific/mathematical papers if algorithms were copyrightable, as mathematicians would not be able to extend another mathematician’s ideas without first gaining permission.

replies(1): >>fulafe+ir3
◧◩
3. fulafe+ir3[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-18 05:44:04
>>zarzav+ky
What constitutes a copyrightable creative piece varies. (And in a lot of places of course algorithms can't be patented either)
[go to top]