zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. zarzav+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-10-17 05:50:20
Algorithms cannot be copyrighted. What is copyrighted is the creative expression of an algorithm. The variable names, the comments, choosing a for loop vs a while loop, or a ternary operator over an “if”, the order of arguments to a function, architectural decisions, etc.

Copyright is formed when a human makes a choice about equivalent ways of implementing an algorithm.

replies(1): >>fulafe+t
2. fulafe+t[view] [source] 2022-10-17 05:55:15
>>zarzav+(OP)
Also this depends on jurisdiction.
replies(1): >>zarzav+Ny
◧◩
3. zarzav+Ny[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-17 11:50:47
>>fulafe+t
Is there a jurisdiction that allows purely algorithms to be copyrighted? As far as I know, usually algorithms come under the umbrella of patents (in jurisdictions that allow software patents) rather than copyright.

For example, it would interfere with e.g. copyright of scientific/mathematical papers if algorithms were copyrightable, as mathematicians would not be able to extend another mathematician’s ideas without first gaining permission.

replies(1): >>fulafe+Lr3
◧◩◪
4. fulafe+Lr3[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-10-18 05:44:04
>>zarzav+Ny
What constitutes a copyrightable creative piece varies. (And in a lot of places of course algorithms can't be patented either)
[go to top]