zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. jefftk+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-09-14 21:07:01
Because it doesn't contribute to Wikipedia remaining online.
replies(3): >>endisn+A >>DrBenC+V3 >>themit+3g
◧
2. endisn+A[view] [source] 2022-09-14 21:10:22
>>jefftk+(OP)
If they get more donations it does, though.
◧
3. DrBenC+V3[view] [source] 2022-09-14 21:26:27
>>jefftk+(OP)
If we agree that a poorly designed experience will become obsolete over time, then how does this expenditure not increase Wiki’s chances of staying online?
replies(1): >>jefftk+xo
◧
4. themit+3g[view] [source] 2022-09-14 22:34:16
>>jefftk+(OP)
So netflix should have only paid for DVDs and shipping?
replies(1): >>jefftk+ho
◧◩
5. jefftk+ho[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-14 23:24:11
>>themit+3g
Elaborate?
replies(1): >>abenga+KR1
◧◩
6. jefftk+xo[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-14 23:26:19
>>DrBenC+V3
The experience isn't and wasn't poorly designed, though. It could surely be improved, but we're incredibly far from "Wikipedia dies through neglect" territory.
◧◩◪
7. abenga+KR1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-15 12:11:15
>>jefftk+ho
Not the GP, but I think they mean keeping an organization alive in the exact state it exists now vs. enabling it to change to adapt to a changing world portend opposite chances that an organization will remain around in the long term.
[go to top]