zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. endisn+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-09-14 20:44:43
Why not?
replies(1): >>jefftk+c4
◧
2. jefftk+c4[view] [source] 2022-09-14 21:07:01
>>endisn+(OP)
Because it doesn't contribute to Wikipedia remaining online.
replies(3): >>endisn+M4 >>DrBenC+78 >>themit+fk
◧◩
3. endisn+M4[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-14 21:10:22
>>jefftk+c4
If they get more donations it does, though.
◧◩
4. DrBenC+78[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-14 21:26:27
>>jefftk+c4
If we agree that a poorly designed experience will become obsolete over time, then how does this expenditure not increase Wiki’s chances of staying online?
replies(1): >>jefftk+Js
◧◩
5. themit+fk[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-14 22:34:16
>>jefftk+c4
So netflix should have only paid for DVDs and shipping?
replies(1): >>jefftk+ts
◧◩◪
6. jefftk+ts[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-14 23:24:11
>>themit+fk
Elaborate?
replies(1): >>abenga+WV1
◧◩◪
7. jefftk+Js[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-14 23:26:19
>>DrBenC+78
The experience isn't and wasn't poorly designed, though. It could surely be improved, but we're incredibly far from "Wikipedia dies through neglect" territory.
◧◩◪◨
8. abenga+WV1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-15 12:11:15
>>jefftk+ts
Not the GP, but I think they mean keeping an organization alive in the exact state it exists now vs. enabling it to change to adapt to a changing world portend opposite chances that an organization will remain around in the long term.
[go to top]