zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. kelchm+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-09-06 21:26:59
Wikipedia link for some background — I hadn’t heard of this before.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiwi_Farms

replies(1): >>worldo+e3
◧
2. worldo+e3[view] [source] 2022-09-06 21:44:45
>>kelchm+(OP)
Wikipedia is reliable to non-controversial topics only. Anything controversial is taken over by one side of the argument and only information that confirms that groups bias is allowed on the page.
replies(1): >>nathan+L3
◧◩
3. nathan+L3[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-06 21:48:19
>>worldo+e3
On articles like that one, the Talk page is a far more realistic view of the subject than the actual page.
replies(1): >>dmatec+96
◧◩◪
4. dmatec+96[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-06 22:03:00
>>nathan+L3
I'd be cautious. One of the people editing these articles has extremely high Wikipedia privileges yet has publicly campaigned for the elimination of the site. There is absolutely no neutrality here.
replies(1): >>JYelle+b63
◧◩◪◨
5. JYelle+b63[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-09-07 19:22:41
>>dmatec+96
I find myself growing more weary and concerned about Wikipedia's bureaucracy and politics. I'm not sure if I'm merely losing my naivete or the Wikimedia Foundation's integrity is in fact decaying.
[go to top]