zlacker

>>danso+(OP)
Wikipedia link for some background — I hadn’t heard of this before.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiwi_Farms

>>kelchm+u1
Wikipedia is reliable to non-controversial topics only. Anything controversial is taken over by one side of the argument and only information that confirms that groups bias is allowed on the page.

>>worldo+I4
On articles like that one, the Talk page is a far more realistic view of the subject than the actual page.

>>nathan+f5
I'd be cautious. One of the people editing these articles has extremely high Wikipedia privileges yet has publicly campaigned for the elimination of the site. There is absolutely no neutrality here.