zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. vog+(OP)[view] [source] 2011-11-15 12:11:41
To the person who downvoted this comment: Could you explain what's wrong with it?
replies(3): >>Andrex+b1 >>vgrich+C2 >>roflha+H3
◧
2. Andrex+b1[view] [source] 2011-11-15 12:47:25
>>vog+(OP)
Probably because it was always the intent to release the ICS source code, and gpl-violations didn't factor into the decision whatsoever. (I didn't downvote your comment though.)
◧
3. vgrich+C2[view] [source] 2011-11-15 13:34:22
>>vog+(OP)
GPL'ed code has been already released by Google, what was released now is under Apache license.
◧
4. roflha+H3[view] [source] 2011-11-15 14:02:36
>>vog+(OP)
From what i can see there is no pressure being put on Google from gpl-violations.org (presumably because the haven't made any violations).

Plenty of heat being put on manufacturers with Android devices but that is hardly Google's fault or related to the ICS release.

[go to top]