zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. vog+(OP)[view] [source] 2011-11-15 07:48:07
Many thanks to http://gpl-violations.org/! Without their pressure this would have taken considerably longer. (Or wouldn't have happened at all?)
replies(1): >>vog+d8
◧
2. vog+d8[view] [source] 2011-11-15 12:11:41
>>vog+(OP)
To the person who downvoted this comment: Could you explain what's wrong with it?
replies(3): >>Andrex+o9 >>vgrich+Pa >>roflha+Ub
◧◩
3. Andrex+o9[view] [source] [discussion] 2011-11-15 12:47:25
>>vog+d8
Probably because it was always the intent to release the ICS source code, and gpl-violations didn't factor into the decision whatsoever. (I didn't downvote your comment though.)
◧◩
4. vgrich+Pa[view] [source] [discussion] 2011-11-15 13:34:22
>>vog+d8
GPL'ed code has been already released by Google, what was released now is under Apache license.
◧◩
5. roflha+Ub[view] [source] [discussion] 2011-11-15 14:02:36
>>vog+d8
From what i can see there is no pressure being put on Google from gpl-violations.org (presumably because the haven't made any violations).

Plenty of heat being put on manufacturers with Android devices but that is hardly Google's fault or related to the ICS release.

[go to top]