zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. dougmw+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-05-23 23:01:31
I think the serious answer is that it is yet another labor multiplier like electricity and software. Our tech since the industrial revolution has allowed us to elevate ourselves from a largely agrarian society to space and cyberspace. AI, by all appearances, continues to be a tool, just the latest in a long line of better tools. It still requires a human to provide intent and direction. Right now in my job, I command the collect output of a million medieval scribes. In the future I will command a million Michelangelos.

Should ML/AI deliver on the wildest promises, it will be like a SpaceX Starship for the mind.

replies(1): >>sydthr+ie
2. sydthr+ie[view] [source] 2022-05-24 01:00:03
>>dougmw+(OP)
Well, anyone over 40 will be fucked. There goes your utopia.
replies(2): >>dougmw+M81 >>machia+Vi1
◧◩
3. dougmw+M81[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-24 10:41:36
>>sydthr+ie
Computers didn't fuck anyone over 40, but they did create new opportunities for young people that slowly took over the labor market and provided a steady stream of productivity growth. Right now these are impressive benchmarks and neat toys that cost millions to train. This is going to be a slow transition to a new paradigm. We are not going to end up in a utopia any more than computers created a utopia.
◧◩
4. machia+Vi1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-24 12:06:15
>>sydthr+ie
No because once this is live, creating private (teaching) assistants and good UX will be cheaper.
[go to top]