zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. state_+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-05-21 23:04:59
If we could all get a stable (guaranteed) 15% per year, everyone would invest. But the world economy doesn’t grow at 15%.
replies(1): >>tjs8rj+E
2. tjs8rj+E[view] [source] 2022-05-21 23:08:46
>>state_+(OP)
The US economy doesn’t grow at 7% a year but that’s what the s&p is expected to do
replies(2): >>hrunt+q1 >>vkou+Zu
◧◩
3. hrunt+q1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-21 23:13:26
>>tjs8rj+E
Well, the S&P (assuming the S&P 500) doesn't represent the entire US economy, but 500 companies that represent, arguably, the "winners" of the US economy, so expecting them to grow 7% while the entire economy as a whole grows less is not unexpected.
replies(1): >>majorm+y1
◧◩◪
4. majorm+y1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-21 23:14:18
>>hrunt+q1
How much of that is inflation? If, historically, GDP growth is about 3% and inflation is about 3%, and you're trying to invest in the strongest companies, is that how you get to 7%+?
replies(1): >>abakke+Ps
◧◩◪◨
5. abakke+Ps[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-22 03:58:08
>>majorm+y1
how many companies lose money for a few years and fold? if the S&P is winners, then it is counterbalanced by all the bad investments, pre revenue startups, and other businesses which are losing money. balancing out to 3% is not impossible.
◧◩
6. vkou+Zu[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-05-22 04:31:57
>>tjs8rj+E
Population growth + inflation + transfer of wealth from workers to capital owners + productivity gains has over the long run been pretty close to 7%.
[go to top]