zlacker

>For example if you surveyed people in 2006 what kind of phone they wanted, most consumers would probably ask for a better flip phone.

Better flip phone would be good too.

>>boznz+(OP)
Samsung make one called the Z-flip. Way too expensive for me, but to me it's the better flip phone I've been waiting for since 2005!

>>pbhjpb+07
I have the Z-Flip 3 and love it. It meets the 2 criteria of the post's 4 that matter to me:

1.fits nicely in pocket. I can sit down comfortably with it in a pair of jeans. No dodgy posture.

2. Won't fall out of my pocket

Its screen is also much less likely to break like has happened with all my old phones when they accidentally fall out of jacket pocket

>>drited+bj
Just don't drop it on the hinge.

Also the z-flip battery life is atrocious, and the CPU is old prev gen tech.

I really want a top tier foldable.

>>metada+Tz
I too want a foldable with the latest generation tech but is that available today?

At the time I bought the z-flip 3 my understanding was that the tradeoff was unavoidable. My opinion at the time of purchase was that the incremental benefit of the latest version of CPU, camera and battery were pretty marginal relative to the large benefit from the unique form factor.

I'm not currently in the market but that could well have changed if new foldables have since been released.