zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. gruez+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-02-08 17:29:17
Yeah wtf, I'm not sure why he's randomly namedropping it.
replies(1): >>openha+V
◧
2. openha+V[view] [source] 2022-02-08 17:32:22
>>gruez+(OP)
I don't understand why you are being so aggressive. This is a post about news on laundering crypto. I am aware of a technology that seems to cater to that use case.
replies(1): >>jhugo+ME1
◧◩
3. jhugo+ME1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-02-09 02:09:45
>>openha+V
I would assume that it's because your comment reads like an advertisement, since it name-drops (and links to) a specific mixer rather than just saying "It seems that a coin mixer could have been used..." Is there anything novel about this particular mixer? If not, why link to this one specifically?
[go to top]