zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. runeks+(OP)[view] [source] 2022-02-08 17:27:04
Are you using Tornado Cash to launder money?
replies(3): >>gruez+F >>openha+G >>Alexan+Hg
◧
2. gruez+F[view] [source] 2022-02-08 17:29:17
>>runeks+(OP)
Yeah wtf, I'm not sure why he's randomly namedropping it.
replies(1): >>openha+A1
◧
3. openha+G[view] [source] 2022-02-08 17:29:17
>>runeks+(OP)
I am personally not, but don't you think that use case is obvious?
◧◩
4. openha+A1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-02-08 17:32:22
>>gruez+F
I don't understand why you are being so aggressive. This is a post about news on laundering crypto. I am aware of a technology that seems to cater to that use case.
replies(1): >>jhugo+rF1
◧
5. Alexan+Hg[view] [source] 2022-02-08 18:30:01
>>runeks+(OP)
Talking about someone laundering money doesn't mean that they are. You are assuming guilt without any cause.

Talking about mixers (such as tornado_cash) is a worthy discussion on a post about laundering cryptocurrencies.

◧◩◪
6. jhugo+rF1[view] [source] [discussion] 2022-02-09 02:09:45
>>openha+A1
I would assume that it's because your comment reads like an advertisement, since it name-drops (and links to) a specific mixer rather than just saying "It seems that a coin mixer could have been used..." Is there anything novel about this particular mixer? If not, why link to this one specifically?
[go to top]