zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. Anon10+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-12-30 13:41:39
Regardless of what it's for, writing 5 digit years is the kind of choice that makes your writing "ooze pretentiousness" just like choosing to use hundred dollar words last seen a century ago.
replies(2): >>mlyle+pP >>kragen+bP1
2. mlyle+pP[view] [source] 2021-12-30 18:40:57
>>Anon10+(OP)
Nah. It's a little conceit. It's a small dash of eccentricity to add spice to an unusual point. It invites one to ask the question, "why do you habitually use 5 digit years?"

You, on the other hand, are veering directly into ad-hom and that's not nice. We can talk about how we like to use language without calling out other peoples' language choices.

3. kragen+bP1[view] [source] 2021-12-31 00:59:21
>>Anon10+(OP)
I venture to aver, you pusillanimous chop-logic, that upon undertaking to investigate the situation in greater profundity, you would in all likelihood discover that you are taking the entire thing entirely too seriously!
replies(1): >>dredmo+el2
◧◩
4. dredmo+el2[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-12-31 06:39:33
>>kragen+bP1
Rule 00005!
[go to top]