zlacker

[return to ""]
1. yesena+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-12-30 12:03:28
I have to mention the elephant in the room - how you, kragen, habitually write e.g. "01888" when "1888" will do — you "choose a polysyllabic and fuzzy word when a simple and clear one is better".
2. dredmo+u7[view] [source] 2021-12-30 13:23:51
>>yesena+(OP)
Y10K proofing. It's a practice of the Long Now Foundation:

https://longnow.org/ideas/02013/12/31/long-now-years-five-di...

◧◩
3. Anon10+59[view] [source] 2021-12-30 13:41:39
>>dredmo+u7
Regardless of what it's for, writing 5 digit years is the kind of choice that makes your writing "ooze pretentiousness" just like choosing to use hundred dollar words last seen a century ago.
◧◩◪
4. kragen+gY1[view] [source] 2021-12-31 00:59:21
>>Anon10+59
I venture to aver, you pusillanimous chop-logic, that upon undertaking to investigate the situation in greater profundity, you would in all likelihood discover that you are taking the entire thing entirely too seriously!
◧◩◪◨
5. dredmo+ju2[view] [source] 2021-12-31 06:39:33
>>kragen+gY1
Rule 00005!
[go to top]