zlacker

Why would 4 get you banned? There doesn't appear to be anything remotely sexual there, at least to me, just implied nudity.

>>stavro+(OP)
Because automatic content detection suck really bad, and a kid in that position might be detected as child porn by a bot

I've had multiple pics flagged by discord as "graphic" even though none were graphic, the last one was a close up picture of a coin held between my fingers

>>lm2846+L3
Ah okay, that makes sense. I thought it was somehow offensive to a human and was wondering why.

>>stavro+(OP)
Nudity in proximity to an animal… not that I’ve tested this, but I wouldn’t stake an account on it.

>>microt+lc
Nudity in proximity to anything is potentially bad if your conception of nudity is "uh oh, sex imminent, which is bad".

Maybe it's a cultural thing, but naked kids aren't uncommon here. It's seen as a natural thing.

>>lm2846+L3
Hands and fingers always trip up NSFW detection models. We use them for automoderation and a lot of people demoing nail art, close up shots of someone painting etc get classified as NSFW. My guess is that fingers kind of look similar to legs to a CNN model and it appears like naked legs.

>>stavro+(OP)
The girl is holding the dog in a position where the wagging of its tail directly stimulates her genital area.