zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. jagged+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-10-01 14:06:01
But this footage is not from within the eye.
replies(2): >>serger+HB >>jacque+sZ
2. serger+HB[view] [source] 2021-10-01 17:00:58
>>jagged+(OP)
is it not? i assumed it was the eye with the title "inside a huricane"

other sites: "For first time ever, drone sent into eye of Cat. 4 hurricane"

the article outlines footage from inside the hurricane.

replies(3): >>jamesh+fS >>jagged+Sc1 >>axpy90+z03
◧◩
3. jamesh+fS[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-10-01 18:32:39
>>serger+HB
‘Inside a hurricane’ could very well mean either ‘inside the envelope around a hurricane where wind speeds exceed hurricane force’, ‘inside the eye wall of a hurricane’, rather than ‘inside the eye of a hurricane’.

If someone tells you there’s jam inside a donut do you complain that the hole through the middle appears to contain no jam?

4. jacque+sZ[view] [source] 2021-10-01 19:21:18
>>jagged+(OP)
It definitely seems like it is from within the eye, or at least extremely close to it based on the video imagery.
◧◩
5. jagged+Sc1[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-10-01 20:43:19
>>serger+HB
> the article outlines footage from inside the hurricane.

Further the article has a video showing the location of the drone in the storm, pretty far from the eye.

◧◩
6. axpy90+z03[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-10-02 17:00:35
>>serger+HB
That does not look like an eye due to darkness. Waves would be a bit calmer too as the wind would die.
[go to top]