zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. djenen+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-09-25 01:03:42
Only a virologist should tell another virologist what to do. Got it.
replies(1): >>teh_kl+c
2. teh_kl+c[view] [source] 2021-09-25 01:06:17
>>djenen+(OP)
Nope, a panel of virologists and related researchers with the same scientific understanding in the field should make these decisions.
replies(1): >>djenen+Y
◧◩
3. djenen+Y[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 01:14:45
>>teh_kl+c
It's ok to have wishful thinking. Plenty of grants include virologists and epidemiologists, so your proposal isn't practical.
replies(1): >>teh_kl+o1
◧◩◪
4. teh_kl+o1[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 01:18:07
>>djenen+Y
Sure, they could provide anecdotal input based on past outbreaks, but they don't have the biological expertise to decide solely on what research should or could be carried out.
replies(1): >>djenen+o3
◧◩◪◨
5. djenen+o3[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 01:39:26
>>teh_kl+o1
Anecdotally, that's not my experience with epi people. A fair few come from a bio/medicine background with a sufficient amount of experience in wet lab and theory to be considered a 'double threat'. Choose your own team.
replies(1): >>teh_kl+o4
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. teh_kl+o4[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 01:50:18
>>djenen+o3
"Anecdotally"
replies(1): >>djenen+P4
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
7. djenen+P4[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 01:55:34
>>teh_kl+o4
That was a reference to your previous comment. Does anecdotal count for nothing? Fine, run a survey of virologists and epidemiologists and report the intersection of set. It will not be arbitrarily small.
replies(1): >>djenen+S6
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
8. djenen+S6[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 02:16:21
>>djenen+P4
I looked through the grant. To my eye, I consider some of the participants as epidemiologists.
[go to top]