zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. teh_kl+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-09-25 01:18:07
Sure, they could provide anecdotal input based on past outbreaks, but they don't have the biological expertise to decide solely on what research should or could be carried out.
replies(1): >>djenen+02
2. djenen+02[view] [source] 2021-09-25 01:39:26
>>teh_kl+(OP)
Anecdotally, that's not my experience with epi people. A fair few come from a bio/medicine background with a sufficient amount of experience in wet lab and theory to be considered a 'double threat'. Choose your own team.
replies(1): >>teh_kl+03
◧◩
3. teh_kl+03[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 01:50:18
>>djenen+02
"Anecdotally"
replies(1): >>djenen+r3
◧◩◪
4. djenen+r3[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 01:55:34
>>teh_kl+03
That was a reference to your previous comment. Does anecdotal count for nothing? Fine, run a survey of virologists and epidemiologists and report the intersection of set. It will not be arbitrarily small.
replies(1): >>djenen+u5
◧◩◪◨
5. djenen+u5[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 02:16:21
>>djenen+r3
I looked through the grant. To my eye, I consider some of the participants as epidemiologists.
[go to top]